Construction Law Insights

Second Department Says Mechanic’s Lien Not Invalid on Its Face

Share This Post

This comes as no surprise, and certainly is not novel law, but the Second Department has again reminded us that “a court has no inherent power to vacate or discharge a notice of lien except as authorized by Lien Law section 19(6).”  At issue was whether a lien was invalid on its face.  The Court found that the documentary evidence presented raised issues of fact as to whether the work performed was within the statutory eight month perio and was performed pursuant to the parties contract.  SeeLane Constr. Co. Inc. v. Chayat.

Need guidance on a construction law issue?

Speak with Kushnick Pallaci about your next step.

Our New York construction attorneys represent contractors, owners, developers, design professionals, and property stakeholders in disputes, contracts, liens, claims, and risk management matters.

Call (631) 752-7100 Contact Us

More To Explore

Speak with a New York construction attorney

For questions about construction contracts, payment disputes, mechanics liens, access agreements, insurance coverage, or project litigation, contact Kushnick Pallaci PLLC.