This comes as no surprise, and certainly is not novel law, but the Second Department has again reminded us that “a court has no inherent power to vacate or discharge a notice of lien except as authorized by Lien Law section 19(6).” At issue was whether a lien was invalid on its face. The Court found that the documentary evidence presented raised issues of fact as to whether the work performed was within the statutory eight month perio and was performed pursuant to the parties contract. SeeLane Constr. Co. Inc. v. Chayat.
Related resources
Construction law guidance connected to this topic
Related mechanic’s lien resources
These related resources provide additional guidance on New York mechanic’s liens, lien enforcement, lien itemization, and construction payment disputes.
Related mechanic’s lien cases
These related articles discuss lien validity, willful exaggeration, condominium liens, and New York mechanic’s lien challenges.
Related construction law resources
Need guidance on a construction law issue?
Speak with Kushnick Pallaci about your next step.
Our New York construction attorneys represent contractors, owners, developers, design professionals, and property stakeholders in disputes, contracts, liens, claims, and risk management matters.


